Imposition of Income Tax on Severance Pay: Dispute Analysis and Legal Interpretation in Tax Court Decisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijla.v4i2.195Keywords:
Income Tax, Severance Pay, Tax Dispute, Tax Court, Legal InterpretationAbstract
Termination of Employment (PHK) not only has consequences for employment but also for taxation, particularly regarding the imposition of Income Tax (PPh) on severance pay. In practice, the imposition of PPh on severance pay often gives rise to disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities due to differing interpretations of applicable legal provisions. This study aims to analyze the typology of PPh disputes on severance pay and the patterns of legal interpretation in Tax Court decisions. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results indicate that disputes are dominated by three main issues: determining the time of tax liability, the tax base, and the classification of payment components. Tax Courts tend to use a substantive approach (substance over form) in interpreting tax provisions. This study emphasizes the importance of norm reformulation to increase legal certainty, fairness, and utility in the tax system.
References
Billy Ivan Tansuria, “Pembayaran dan Pemotongan Pajak atas Uang Pesangon”, Journal of Business and Economics June 2011 Vol. 10 No. 1, hlm 1-14.
Christina NM Tobing, “Legal Certainty of Payment of Workers Rights Due to Termination of Employment in Post Job Creation Law”, Proceeding from the 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights (ICLHR) 2021, April 14-15, Jakarta, Indonesia, Published EAI, http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.14-4-2121.2312521.
Christina NM Tobing, dkk., “Penyelesaian Perselisihan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Secara Sepihak yang Dilakukan Oleh Pengusaha”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora Kultura, (2026), 4 (1), hlm. 110-119.
David Yosua Umboh dkk., “Prosedur Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak di Pengadilan Pajak Menurut Undang Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2002”, Lex Administratum, Vol. IX, No. 8, Oktober-Desember 2021, hlm. 5, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/36575/34015.
Gladwin wijaya dan Urbanisasi, “Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Sistem Perpajakan Indonesia, Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 2 Oktober-Desember 2025, hlm. 11915-1192, https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i2.3747.
Maysanda Rahmanisa Zahra et.al, “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) di Indonesia”, Master Journal of Multidiciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research, 2 (1b), 2025, 1150-1159, https://doi.org/10.32672/mister.v2i1b.2643, hlm. 1152.
Michael Kalep Simarmata dan Rasji, “Analisis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Secara Sepihak dengan Perjanjian Kerja Kemitraan Menurut Hukum Ketenagakerjaan”, Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, Vol.5 No.5 (2024), Tema/ Edisi: Hukum Perburuhan dan Ketenagakerjaan (Bulan Kelima), https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/679.
Noor Rizky Firdhausy, “Uang Pensiun dan Pesangon Kena Pajak? Cek Faktanya”, https://pajak.go.id/id/artikel/uang-pensiun-dan-pesangon-kena-pajak-cek-faktanya, diakses tanggal 10 Maret 2026.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005.
Reda Manthovani, “Keberlakuan Ketentuan Pasal 3 ayat (1) Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 16/PMK.03/2010”, Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia, Vol.IV No. 1 Januari Tahun 2019, https://jurnal.uai.ac.id/index.php/JMIH/article/download/2310/pdf.
Umar Kasim, “Hubungan Kerja Dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja”, Jurnal Informasi Hukum, Vol. 2, Tahun 2004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Christina NM Tobing, Albert Loudewijk Sentosa Siahaan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





